U.S. Catholic leaders are “fighting mad with the Obama administration,” says
Michael Brendan Dougherty at Business Insider, and they’re taking the fight to
the pews. Over the weekend, Catholic parishioners nationwide were read letters
from their bishops decrying the feds’ recent decision to require religiously
affiliated hospitals, colleges, and charities to offer insurance coverage for
contraception, sterilization, and the “morning-after” pill — all of which the
Catholic Church officially opposes.
These rules are perfectly reasonable: Catholic schools and hospitals hire and
serve people of many different faiths, says Kevin Drum at Mother Jones. And if
these institutions “don’t want to follow reasonable, 21st century secular rules…
they need to stop taking secular taxpayer money.” If you take taxpayer
money, you have to follow taxpayer rules.
Churches themselves were given a religious exemption from the new rule, which
is part of Obama’s health care reform, but the bishops said forcing other
Catholic institutions to comply violates “the fundamental right to religious
liberty” guaranteed in the Constitution. American Catholics don’t agree with the
church on birth control — 95 percent use contraceptives, and 89 percent say it’s
their choice, not the church’s. Still, is the Obama administration abusing its
power?
My rebuttal is:
It seems to me that the point needs to be made that Catholic institutions
are not “secular in nature.” They are a part of the Church’s outreach and
ministry of service. They result from Catholic belief and they support Catholic
belief. That being said it is a fact in this case the U.S. government is forcing
Catholic religious institutions to pay for services that violate Catholic
teaching regardless of how many Catholics disregard the Church’s
teachings.
The colonists (Quakers, Free Thinkers, Congregationalists, Presbyterians,
and Catholics) came to this country in order to escape governmental control of
their beliefs and practices. The First Amendment in our Bill of Rights
guarantees freedom from governmental control of our
beliefs and our religious institutions. What is at stake here is not whether
people accept Catholic teachings but rather whether our government can control
how we put our teachings into practice.
What’s next? Revocation of the tax free status of churches that don’t
conform to governmental mandates?
We have here a constitutional issue that is destined to be adjudicated in
the U.S. Supreme Court.
Great rebuttal. I find it very puzzling that so many people are questioning the issue of birth control and the reality that many Catholics do not follow their church's teaching in this are. As you point out these issues are irrelevant. What is at stake is all of our First Amendment protections. (So happy to see that you have started a blog)
ReplyDelete